|
“An inappropriate technology is one that acquires imperatives of its
own and
becomes the master, instead of the slave, of human beings”
With ‘O' and ‘A' levels from St. Lawrence College, UK coupled with BA (Hons), MA
(Natural Sciences) from Cambridge University, UK, and A.M. Ph.D (Experimental
Physics) from Harvard University, USA, he was, from 1963 to 1971, the Resident
Tutor in Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Later, till 1976, he was a
Director in the Office of Environmental Planning and Coordination under the
Ministry of Science and Technology, GOI, New Delhi. From there on (1976 to
1982), he worked with United Nations' Environmental Programme, Nairobi. He has
also been awarded the Global 500 Roll of Honour of the United Nations order of
the Golden Ark of the Netherlands. Meet Dr Ashok Khosla,
President of Development Alternatives, an NGO working in the field of
Appropriate Technology, environmental management, policy advocacy etc. since
1983 and head of Technology and Action for Rural Advancement (TARA) in an
exclusive
interview with Editor-NetVarsity.com
Q1: What prompted you to set up Development Alternatives? And why
did you choose this
particular name?
A1: Some 20 years back, my colleagues and I had worked for long enough in
universities, government,
international agencies and business to realise that none of the existing
institutions of society would or
even could address the most pressing issues facing humankind: eradication of
poverty and regeneration of
the environment. The current patterns of development were only serving to worsen
the disparities and
resource destruction. Every day, there were more poor people in our country and
fewer trees.
Fundamentally different approaches are needed to attack the real problems of
society. This is why
Development Alternatives was set up and how it acquired its name.
Q2: How do you define sustainable development? Does it have a time
dimension to it?
A2: Sustainable development is a process of improving current societal
conditions without jeopardising the
ability of future generations to have their own options for a good life. It
needs sustainable consumption patterns and sustainable production systems. It
leads to equity and social justice, improved environmental quality and efficient
management of economic resources. And, thus to empowerment. The time dimension
inherent in the concept of sustainability, which links the present to the
future, gives it a simple yet powerful meaning for planning economic activities,
both in the public and private sectors. No economic activity should be allowed
that cuts off the choices our children would need to make for themselves.
Q3: How is Development Alternatives different from the large number
of other NGOs that exist
today in India?
A3: Development Alternatives is an independent organisation registered as a
Society, like any NGO.
However, unlike most NGOs, it believes that technology and the marketplace are
efficient instruments for
changing the lives of people for the better – provided they are appropriately
designed and used. It acts
on the understanding that societal problems are complex and need cross-sectoral,
trans-disciplinary and
multi-dimensional solutions for which it has established a broad based cadre of
high quality professionals
with a wide range of expertise.
Q4: Are international connections (with, for example, the World
Bank, the UN or foundations)
essential for raising financial support in the NGO sector? Does this have an
impact on the
willingness of people to work in NGOs?
A4: Since there are very few sources of funds within India, either from
government or philanthropic
sources, overseas financial support certainly plays an important part in
nurturing certain kinds of civil
society (NGO) activities. But this is not necessarily bad, provided the NGO that
receives outside funding
maintains its integrity and basic purpose. The need for external money would be
greatly diminished if
policy makers and business leaders were interested in finding effective
solutions to the real issues of our
country. In my experience, the attractiveness of working in the NGO sector has
much less to do with the
sources of funds than with the limited budgets they have to work with – and
therefore the low salaries
they have to offer.
Q5: What is “appropriate” about your technology?
A5: A technology is appropriate when it serves the purpose for which it was
designed, usually to improve
in some way the lives of people. It is inappropriate when it acquires
imperatives of its own and becomes
the master, instead of the slave, of human beings. Many large and centralised
technologies – energy
systems, transportation systems, agricultural systems – have taken over our
lives, destroying the social
fabric and the health of both people and our environment. The technologies
designed and promoted by
Development Alternatives are meant to re-establish the balance between the
individual, society and
nature. They are of a human scale and maximise well-being while minimising
negative consequences.
Q6: What are examples of the appropriate technologies you promote?
A6: Simple water pumping and purification devices, effective sanitation systems,
renewable energy
equipment, cost-effective construction materials, recycled and handmade paper
units, efficient handlooms,
resource conservation systems, and many other small scale, decentralised
technologies suitable for local
use in villages and communities throughout the country. Our electricity company,
DESI Power, for
example sets up small generating plants in collaboration with small villages.
These plants use renewable
fuels (such as biomass, agro wastes, weeds, solar energy, etc) and not only
bring the utility within the
control of the community but also save many environmental values, including
local pollution and the
global climate. The job of Development Alternatives, through its commercial wing
– Technology and
Action for Rural Advancement (TARA) – is to create jobs and deliver goods and
services aimed at fulfilling
the basic needs of people.
Q7: Is anything done with respect to creating jobs for the
illiterate people of rural India?
A7: Yes, jobs for the jobless, who are primarily the women, the illiterates and
the poor. These are the
marginalised and dis-empowered people of our country and they are in this state
partly because they have
virtually no financial security. And they have no financial security mainly
because they do not have jobs.
We call the kinds of jobs they need “sustainable livelihoods” because such jobs
provide a viable income on
a permanent basis, give meaning and dignity to life and also serve to regenerate
the environmental
resource base on which their children will depend. Many people in our rural
areas may well be illiterate,
but they are certainly not dumb. Given the same opportunities you and I had,
they would do equally well,
if not better at making their lives productive and useful. Since no one else,
particularly in government or
business, is likely to provide such opportunities, Development Alternatives
plans to help them create such
opportunities for themselves.
Q8: How do your initiatives help empower women and move them out of
thousand year old,
deeply rooted social structures?
A8: Empowerment of women needs many fundamental changes in our society and in
our culture.
Development Alternatives is not geared to address all of them, much though my
colleagues and I would
like to. We have neither the expertise nor the means to do so. However, we
believe that there is one
intervention that can have a major impact, and it is the one we focus on most:
the sustainable livelihoods
I just mentioned. It is our aim to develop the technologies, financing methods
and market institutions
that favour the participation of women and provide them with options and
opportunities to stand on their
feet, both in the home and in the community. Many other things need also to be
done, and many other
actors must also take responsibility – including, for example, journalists like
you and companies like
yours.
Q9: What are the policy and financial barriers to widespread
deployment of these technologies
and institutions?
A9: The policies of our country, like those of almost any other, are made by the
rich and powerful for the
rich and powerful. Sustainable technologies like ours are geared primarily to
the needs of the poor, the
voiceless, and the disempowered. The policies, laws and regulations therefore
cannot be expected to
make things easy for initiatives like ours. This is why we set up an advocacy
organisation, People First,
which has the responsibility to bring about fundamental changes in the policy
frameworks so as to allow
civil society to address the problems of the poor and of environmental
conservation more effectively.
Q10: New technologies like yours will need new skills. How will
workers in rural areas get
these skills?
A10: Development Alternatives has established one of the major training
programmes in the country for
sustainable technology. We teach people to make, use and maintain all the
technologies we put on the
market. We also learn from them in the process about what they need and what
they can do.
Often, they teach us useful things about the technologies too. Our plan is to
set up a major training
institution, TARA University, which will provide all the training needed to help
small rural entrepreneurs
effectively deliver the goods and services people in their villages need.
Q11: Development Alternatives seems to be the first example of an
organisation that, contrary
to conventional wisdom, mixes social and business objectives. Does such a
combination work?
A11: You judge for yourself. We are still here, after 20 years of continuous
mixing. Actually, it is not
quite correct that we mix social and business objectives. Our objectives are
entirely driven by the need to
serve the interests of society and the natural environment. But we do so in a
business-like way: our
strategies, methods and tools are those of business --but not objectives. We
understood right from the
beginning that our operations would not be “sustainable” if they were not
commercially viable – not only
because government or charity could not be expected to subsidise them for long,
but also because they
would sooner or later die of inefficiencies and loss of direction. So, all of
our activities (except research)
are designed to be self-financing, and indeed, profitable. The surpluses we
generate go back into
innovation and growth of our operations.
Q12: How much difference has Development Alternatives, and its
partner organisations such as
TARA and DESI Power, made to the quality of our country’s environment?
A12: It is never easy to measure environmental impact in the kinds of rural
interventions that our Group
of organizations is engaged in. Much of our effort is devoted to regenerating
the resource base on which
rural people depend – the forests, soils, rivers and gene pool. I think it would
be fair to say that where we
have worked locally, we have made a big difference; but in comparison with the
needs of our country, we
are only scratching the surface. DESI Power has demonstrated a significant way
to cut down on carbon
emissions, TARA has shown how dramatically the lives of whole villages can
change with the installation of
a small check dam and Development Alternatives has shown the possibilities of
scientific techniques for
aforestation. It will, however, be some years yet that we can look back and
point to large scale
environmental amelioration specifically coming as a result of our actions.
Q13: What was the genesis of your new Internet venture TARAhaat.com?
How will it overcome
lack of computer literacy in the village?
A13: TARAhaat.com came into being last year because of a deep and long standing
desire in our
organisation to help bridge the growing digital divide. The Internet, like other
recently developed
technologies – including the personal computer, genetic engineering, robotics,
space applications, etc – is
an extremely powerful agent of change. Left alone to the vagaries of the market,
it can only widen the
gap between the haves and the have nots. But harnessed for the benefit of all,
these technologies are
also the only hope for closing the gap. We see TARAhaat, which includes the
Mother Portal TARAhaat.com
together with the franchised TARAkendras we are setting up in villages
throughout the country to provide
Internet access, as the means to level the playing field for the rural poor.
Through TARAhaat, the rural
economy can have access to the information, goods and services they need to
revive their economies and
lead a more fulfilled life. Our experience shows that computer illiteracy is a
meaningless concept: in fact,
the less you know, the less you have to unlearn to use the computer in a useful
way.
Q14: But how will people’s lives improve as a result of using
TARAhaat.com? Will it not
become yet another middleman and still continue to exploit the poor?
A14: TARAhaat’s purpose is to provide access to information, goods and services
needed by the rural poor
so they can act in their own best interest. It does not seek to take over the
work of middlemen who serve
a very useful function, albeit often in an exploitative way. A farmer who has
knowledge of the mandi
prices is in a better position to negotiate with the middleman than one who does
not know the current
prices. A farmer who has additional options for selling his or her produce is in
a still better position. And
the same applies to a villager who wishes to buy seeds, a bicycle or a
television. But e-commerce is only
one of many services provided by TARAhaat.com. A user can get government
services through the Portal,
not to mention education, information, health care, entertainment and many other
things as well. It is
precisely because the Internet should not itself become another agent of
exploitation that Development
Alternatives set up TARAhaat.com in the first place.
Q15: What is your future plan?
A15: More of the same.
|